amezri: (gollum)
[personal profile] amezri
Copyright chatter at [livejournal.com profile] animeicons:

"I would like to bring it to all of your attention that fanart is the personal property of the artist. They may do with it as they wish, because it is theirs. Anyone else, however, may not. Taking it and making it into icons, wallpapers, ect. is stealing. I don't care if you did or did not claim it as your own. It is still stealing, especially to the artist you took from. You are taking someone else's hard work and making it into something of your own and giving it away. How would you feel if someone took something that you worked hard on and passed it around and no one knew it was yours? I'm sure you wouldn't like that. Yes, some people might provide links, but some artists don't want their fanart used by anyone at all. I've heard, "Well some art has been passed around so much that the original artist was lost. Why not use it?" That's like asking, "Well everyone else smokes, why shouldn't I?" Thinking like that is why the original artist was forgotten in the first place. A better question is, "Why should you continue the chain?" Please tell me you all know better than to take something that is someone else's? Your parents or your kindergarten teacher must have taught you that stealing is a no-no right? If you would like to use fanart for something, ask the artist. That way everyone is happy. It doesn't matter if it's all right with the community; the community is not the artist. This is about morals and common sense people. I would like to say I have absolutely nothing against any of you. I'm just posting this to everyone in general. People stealing fanart is getting way out of hand these days and I'm getting tired of it. Just because it's on the internet doesn't mean anyone can take it. There are such things as copyright laws too, if you didn't know. I'm sorry if I've made anyone mad, but this is ridiculous. This is what I believe and I'm standing beside it. If you think less of me for it, so be it. If you want to read more on the subject click the banner below. The site says it's against reusing Japanese fanart, but it goes for all fanart I believe.



It's a good site. I recommend you take a look, even if you don't use fanart.

Well, I guess that's all for now. I'm betting I'll be getting some flames, but that's okay."


My reply:

I'm not really for or against any of this, but let's play Devil's advocate.

All creative works are copyrighted from the moment they are concieved. Fan artists get pissy when people use their works without asking. However, don't you think that the original artists are going to get pissy if you use their stuff without asking or use it when they tell you not to?

But they're famous, so it happens. Um. Okay, so in that same line of thought, if a fan artist is "famous" it's okay to use their stuff without asking? Yes, there is a difference between the two. Generally, fan artists don't get paid for their work. They feel they've put a lot of work into it, so they don't want people stealing it because, logically, people will not know they did it. Well, the professionals have put in years of schooling and they don't want people taking their stuff either, recognizable or not. When you use their stuff online without permission, you're essentially robbing them of their commission fees and possibly showing their work in a way they don't want.

Don't get me wrong, I use other people's artwork too. But I can admit that I'm too lazy to make my own and if I'm asked to take it down, I'm not going to get mad. If someone steals mine, I'm not going to be too pissed about it if it happens. If I catch you, however, I'll ask for credit; can't really make you give it. Other than that, don't make it look like crap and be on your merry way.

To say that you want to protect fanart, but are allowing original art to be used in all the ways you don't want fanart to be used is stupid and narrowminded. Either you're against use of other people's work or you're not. You cannot allow one group to be manipulated because they are "professional" or "original" but then claim to protect "fanart" copyrights. Fanart in and of itself is often copyright violation.

Flame on.

Uhm....

Date: 2003-05-02 09:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] logansrogue.livejournal.com
Woah there, Nelly. One thing defines original art from fan art. People *know* who did the original art. I think that's probably the point of contention with the person in the first argument. It's not like the person is asking people to do much, not asking them not to use it, just to ask first. I do believe that's a common courtesy that all artists are allowed: Ask and credit. In the case of famous artists, you can't do that, but you do try to let people know who did it. With original art, there's no way you can be mistaken who did the Mona Lisa, or Waterlilies, you know? But say, if someone took one of my HP artworks without asking - no one will know I did it, and that person might get heaps of praise for the icon. What if they say, "I don't know who did it"? Then I'm out of the loop, and I've lost an important bit of publicity. Every little bit is important, especially for someone like me who desperately needs commissions - you know what I mean? The message here is basically - it's not a black and white issue here, and fan art needs to be protected too.

Yeah, I was snippy this morning.

Date: 2003-05-02 10:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amezri.livejournal.com
I'm not saying fan art doesn't need to be protected/credited. That probably wasn't clear. I'm saying *all* art needs to be protected/credited. I've seen cases where people are masquerading original art as their own or don't know the name of the original artist (that's just sad).

Anyway, my post was a bit incomplete. There were people at the community replying with things like "it's okay to use original art because who cares? but fanart is copyrighted!" and it pissed me off.

Plus it was loaded with odd sarcasm. ^_^*

Ohhhh now I understand!

Date: 2003-05-02 10:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] logansrogue.livejournal.com
Then I agree with you. All art needs protection, is what I was saying. I didn't know you meant that too! *hugs* I should know better! You feeling better now?

Re: Ohhhh now I understand!

Date: 2003-05-02 11:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amezri.livejournal.com
*hugs* Of course! :) And I'm a bit more awake now. Hope your sister gets better soon!

Re: Uhm....

Date: 2003-05-02 10:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iambliss.livejournal.com
That's very true, and I don't think that's what she was disagreeing with, so much as the implication that it's okay to do fanart that might not necessarily give proper credit to the origianl author/artist/owner of the copyright, but that fanart should be copyrighted and the artist thereof be given credit. Seems like her argument was rather that EVERONE, original artists and fanartists, be given their copyright due. Sounds fair to me... :)

What do you think, 'mez? Am I wrong?

Yeah I should have known better...

Date: 2003-05-02 10:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] logansrogue.livejournal.com
Cyn wouldn't have argued the way I percieved it. Never mind me, it's the am and I'm insomniacing due to worry over my sister in hospital so I'm not really thinking straight. Hope I haven't caused upset. *blibs*

Re: Yeah I should have known better...

Date: 2003-05-02 11:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iambliss.livejournal.com
*chuckle* I'm good. And Cyn rocks.
Get some rest... it's good for you. *hug*

Re: Yeah I should have known better...

Date: 2003-05-02 12:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amezri.livejournal.com
Aw, no worries ^_^ No one's been upset. And more well wishes for your sister. *mwah*

Re: Uhm....

Date: 2003-05-02 11:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amezri.livejournal.com
You are correct! :D

Re: Uhm....

Date: 2003-05-02 11:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iambliss.livejournal.com
Woo!
*huggles*

Date: 2003-05-02 10:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carlamlee.livejournal.com
You made some really good points in your reply. In the fandoms I've been a part of, I've only run across problems like that once or twice, but it always seemed to me that all art/writing/whatever needed to be protected. It's not like just because the professional artist/writer/director/whatever shared her vision with us, we can then steal away. But you said that much better than I just did.

I have noticed that, at least from what I've seen, the big difference is that most people give credit to the professional. I know I always slap on a disclaimer and give credit where credit is due, because it's only right. Even if I'm using someone else's image or character or universe, a fan-based universe, I give them credit, too. But it's when no credit is given, either to professionals or to fans, that I really get pissed off.

I'm rambling now. I just wanted to say that you made a good point.

Profile

amezri: (Default)
amezri

December 2016

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4567 8 910
111213 14 151617
1819 20 212223 24
25 26 27 2829 30 31

Style Credit

Page generated Mar. 7th, 2026 12:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags